4.6 Article

Anterior and posterior ratio of corneal surface areas: A novel index for detecting early stage keratoconus

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231074

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic ability of the ratio of anterior and posterior corneal surface areas (As/Ps) comparing with other keratoconus screening indices in distinguishing forme fruste keratoconus (FFKC) from normal eyes. Methods In this comparative study, 13 eyes of 13 patients with FFKC, 29 eyes of 29 patients with keratoconus (KC) and 88 eyes of 88 patients with normal subjects were involved. The As/Ps measured by the anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and other indices measured by AS-OCT and rotating Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography were evaluated. The area under receiver-operating-characteristics (AU-ROC) was calculated to assess the diagnostic ability in discriminating FFKC from normal eyes. Results The As/Ps, the Belin/Ambrosio display enhanced ectasia total derivation value (BAD-D) and posterior and anterior elevation values showed the AU-ROC 0.9 or more in differentiating FFKC from normal eyes (0.980, 0.951, 0.924 and 0.903, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 and 0.96 for the As/Ps, 1.00 and 0.90 for BAD-D, 0.85 and 0.86 for posterior elevation value, and 0.85 and 0.96 for anterior elevation value, respectively. Conclusions Among the several indices for keratoconus screening which we evaluated, the As/Ps obtained by AS-OCT had the large AU-ROC with high sensitivity and specificity in detecting FFKC, which was comparable with BAD-D obtained by rotating Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography. The As/Ps may provide information for improving the diagnostic accuracy of KC, even in the initial stage of the disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available