4.1 Article

Effects of metal quantity and quality to the removal of zinc and copper by two common green microalgae (Chlorophyceae) species

Journal

PHYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages 227-235

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pre.12422

Keywords

bioaccumulation; biosorption; copper; Desmodesmus communis; Monoraphidium pusillum; zinc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Appearance of metals as pollutants in the environment is an increasing global problem. Microalgae as subjects of biological remediation methods may provide a cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative to the removal of metals during wastewater treatment. Despite the high number of data in the topic, there is still little information on how the type and the concentration of the metal affect the process of removal. In this study, correlations among the algal species, quality and quantity of metals and characteristics of metal removal mechanism were investigated at lower metal concentrations (0.2-5.0 mg L-1) during zinc and copper removal of the green algaeDesmodesmus communisandMonoraphidium pusillum. Analyses of the results proved that there is a statistically significant interaction (P < 0.05) between algal species and quality and concentration of the metals, that is, they have a significant effect on the mode and extent of removal. Both metals were mainly extracellularly bound, but at concentrations of 0.2-1.4 mg L-1, intracellular proportion could exceed the extracellular adsorption. Although there were differences between the two algae, generally copper appeared in a higher intracellular proportion than zinc in the whole studied concentration range. Overall, the quality and initial concentration of the metal is decisive for the way of removal, the knowledge of which is useful for planning post treatment retention times or post treatment processes of the used biomass during wastewater treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available