4.7 Article

The Diabetes Risk and Determinants of Transition from Metabolically Healthy to Unhealthy Phenotypes in 49,702 Older Adults: 4-Year Cohort Study

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 1141-1148

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.22800

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81200611, 81600643, 91746205]
  2. Ministry of Education, China [2013M530881]
  3. Tianjin Health Industry Key Research Projects [15KG101]
  4. Tianjin Science and Technology Support Project [17JCYBJC27000]
  5. Key Projects of the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [18JCZDJC32900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective This study aimed to assess whether metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) increases the risk of diabetes and to explore how the occurrence of metabolic disorders affects the risk of diabetes and which factors determine metabolic health. Methods This study examined 49,702 older people without diabetes via the Binhai Health Screening Program in Tianjin. Results Compared with individuals with metabolic health and normal weight, the risk of diabetes was increased in older adults with MHO (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.786, 95% CI: 1.407-2.279) but was not significantly increased when metabolic health was characterized by the absence of metabolic abnormalities. The older adults who were initially affected by MHO and then converted to having an unhealthy phenotype had a higher diabetes risk than older individuals with stable and healthy normal weight (HR: 3.727, 95% CI: 2.721-5.105). Waist circumference was an independent predictor of the transition from a metabolically healthy status to an unhealthy status in all BMI categories (odds ratio: 1.059, 95% CI: 1.026-1.032). Conclusions The MHO phenotype was associated with an increased incidence of diabetes in older adults. The presence of metabolic disorders in the group with MHO was associated with an increased diabetes risk and was predicted by the waist circumference at baseline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available