4.4 Review

Overcoming challenges of the human spinal cord tractography for routine clinical use: a review

Journal

NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 9, Pages 1079-1094

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02442-8

Keywords

Tractography; Spinal cord; Diffusion tensor imaging; Fiber tracking; Review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The spinal cord (SC) is a dense network of billions of fibers in a small volume surrounded by bones that makes tractography difficult to perform. We aim to provide a review collecting all technical settings of SC tractography and propose the optimal set of parameters to perform a good SC tractography rendering. The MEDLINE database was searched for articles reporting spinal cord tractography in humans. Studies were selected only when tractography rendering was displayed and MRI acquisition and tracking parameters detailed. From each study, clinical context, imaging acquisition settings, fiber tracking parameters, region of interest (ROI) design, and quality of the tractography rendering were extracted. Quality of tractography rendering was evaluated by several objective criteria proposed herein. According to the reported studies, to obtain a good tractography rendering, diffusion tensor imaging acquisition should be performed with 1.5 or 3 Tesla MRI, in the axial plane, with > 20 directions; b value: 1000 s mm(-2); right-left phase-encoding direction for cervical SC; isotropic voxel size; and no slice gap. Concerning the tracking process, it should be performed with determinist approach, fractional anisotropy threshold between 0.15 and 0.2, and curvature threshold of 40 degrees. ROI design is an essential step for providing good tractography rendering, and their placement has to consider partial volume effects, magnetic susceptibility effects, and motion artifacts. The review reported herein highlights that successful SC tractography depends on many factors (imaging acquisition settings, fiber tracking parameters, and ROI design) to obtain a good SC tractography rendering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available