4.8 Article

Cortical Observation by Synchronous Multifocal Optical Sampling Reveals Widespread Population Encoding of Actions

Journal

NEURON
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages 351-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.04.023

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-114747]
  2. Stanford Dean's Fellowship
  3. NSF CAREER Award [IIS 1553333]
  4. Terman Faculty fellowship
  5. Sloan fellowship
  6. DARPA
  7. PECASE by the ARL [W911NF-19-1-0120]
  8. DARPA Neuro-FAST program
  9. NIMH
  10. NIDA
  11. NSF
  12. Simons Foundation
  13. Wiegers Family Fund
  14. Nancy and James Grosfeld Foundation
  15. H.L. Snyder Medical Foundation
  16. Samuel and Betsy Reeves Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To advance the measurement of distributed neuronal population representations of targeted motor actions on single trials, we developed an optical method (COSMOS) for tracking neural activity in a largely uncharacterized spatiotemporal regime. COSMOS allowed simultaneous recording of neural dynamics at similar to 30 Hz from over a thousand near-cellular resolution neuronal sources spread across the entire dorsal neocortex of awake, behaving mice during a three-option lick-to-target task. We identified spatially distributed neuronal population representations spanning the dorsal cortex that precisely encoded ongoing motor actions on single trials. Neuronal correlations measured at video rate using unaveraged, whole-session data had localized spatial structure, whereas trial-averaged data exhibited widespread correlations. Separable modes of neural activity encoded history-guided motor plans, with similar population dynamics in individual areas throughout cortex. These initial experiments illustrate how COSMOS enables investigation of large-scale cortical dynamics and that information about motor actions is widely shared between areas, potentially underlying distributed computations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available