Test of general relativity by a pair of transportable optical lattice clocks
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Test of general relativity by a pair of transportable optical lattice clocks
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Nature Photonics
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-04-07
DOI
10.1038/s41566-020-0619-8
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Optical clock comparison for Lorentz symmetry testing
- (2019) Christian Sanner et al. NATURE
- Al+27 Quantum-Logic Clock with a Systematic Uncertainty below 10−18
- (2019) S. M. Brewer et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Geodesy and metrology with a transportable optical clock
- (2018) Jacopo Grotti et al. Nature Physics
- Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level
- (2018) W. F. McGrew et al. NATURE
- Test of the Gravitational Redshift with Galileo Satellites in an Eccentric Orbit
- (2018) Sven Herrmann et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Gravitational Redshift Test Using Eccentric Galileo Satellites
- (2018) P. Delva et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Operational Magic Intensity for Sr Optical Lattice Clocks
- (2018) Ichiro Ushijima et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- New bounds on dark matter coupling from a global network of optical atomic clocks
- (2018) P. Wcisło et al. Science Advances
- Geodetic methods to determine the relativistic redshift at the level of 10 $$^{-18}$$ - 18 in the context of international timescales: a review and practical results
- (2017) Heiner Denker et al. JOURNAL OF GEODESY
- Determination of a high spatial resolution geopotential model using atomic clock comparisons
- (2017) G. Lion et al. JOURNAL OF GEODESY
- Transportable Optical Lattice Clock with 7×10−17 Uncertainty
- (2017) S. B. Koller et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- 1.5 μm Lasers with Sub-10 mHz Linewidth
- (2017) D. G. Matei et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- What makes the Universe accelerate? A review on what dark energy could be and how to test it
- (2017) Philippe Brax REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS
- Geopotential measurements with synchronously linked optical lattice clocks
- (2016) Tetsushi Takano et al. Nature Photonics
- Searching for an Oscillating Massive Scalar Field as a Dark Matter Candidate Using Atomic Hyperfine Frequency Comparisons
- (2016) A. Hees et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Single-Ion Atomic Clock with3×10−18Systematic Uncertainty
- (2016) N. Huntemann et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Ground-based optical atomic clocks as a tool to monitor vertical surface motion
- (2015) Ruxandra Bondarescu et al. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
- Cryogenic optical lattice clocks
- (2015) Ichiro Ushijima et al. Nature Photonics
- Strategies for reducing the light shift in atomic clocks
- (2015) Hidetoshi Katori et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW A
- Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks
- (2015) Asimina Arvanitaki et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Searching for Dark Matter and Variation of Fundamental Constants with Laser and Maser Interferometry
- (2015) Y. V. Stadnik et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Search for Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter with Atomic Spectroscopy
- (2015) Ken Van Tilburg et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10−18 total uncertainty
- (2015) T.L. Nicholson et al. Nature Communications
- The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
- (2014) Clifford M. Will Living Reviews in Relativity
- Hunting for topological dark matter with atomic clocks
- (2014) A. Derevianko et al. Nature Physics
- Frequency comparison of optical lattice clocks beyond the Dick limit
- (2011) Masao Takamoto et al. Nature Photonics
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started