4.6 Article

Hematite coated, conductive Y doped ZnO nanorods for high efficiency solar water splitting

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 26, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab776c

Keywords

Y doped ZnO nanorods; solar water splitting; hematite coating; optical waveguide

Funding

  1. University of Sussex school of life sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For the first time, hematite (alpha-Fe2O3) crystals were electrochemically deposited over vertically aligned conductive zinc oxide nanorods (NR) to form a specially designed 3D heterostructure with a unique triple layer structure. The structure formed with a thin layer of ZnFe(2)O(4)sandwiched between the hematite and the ZnO, which forms a barrier to reduce the back migration of holes. Hence, the charge separation is significantly improved. The small unequal bandgaps of alpha-Fe(2)O(3)and ZnFe(2)O(4)help to enhance and broaden visible light absorption. The electron transportation was further improved by yttrium doping in the ZnO (YZnO) NRs, resulting in increased conductivity. This allowed the vertically aligned NRs to perform as electron highways, which also behave as effective optical waveguides for improved light trapping and absorption, since ZnO absorbs little visible light. All these benefits made the unique structures suitable for high performance photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting. Optimisation of alpha-Fe(2)O(3)thickness led to a photocurrent density improvement from 0.66 to 0.95 mA cm(-2)at 1.23 V-RHE. This was further improved to 1.59 mA cm(-2)by annealing at 550 degrees C for 3 h, representing a record-breaking photocurrent for alpha-Fe2O3/ZnO systems. Finally IPCE confirmed the successful generation and transfer of photoelectrons under visible light excitation in the specifically designed heterostructure photoanode, with 5% efficiency for blue light, and 15% for violet light.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available