4.7 Article

Transmission chain error elimination for gear hobbing machines based on classified compensation theory and frequency response identification

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107596

Keywords

Transmission chain error; Error compensation; Harmonic error; Frequency response; Gear hobbing machine

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51905057, 51635003]
  2. Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing, Chongqing Science and Technology Commission [cstc2019jcyjmsxmX0050]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFB1701203]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018CDXYJX0019]
  5. China Scholarship Council [201906050173]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel classified compensation method considering frequency response to eliminate the transmission chain error (TCE) of gear hobbing machines. Based on error source analysis and Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT), the measured TCE was firstly decomposed into different error components, including the integer harmonic, the non-integer harmonic and the other. A classified compensation theory was then presented, in which the Measurement System Error Compensation (MSEC) and the software axis were used to compensate the first two types of error components, respectively. Then, the frequency response identification for the C-axis control system was performed, and the final compensation values were calculated and integrated into the classified compensation process. The experimental results on a YS3120-type gear hobbing machine showed that the peak-to-peak value of TCE was reduced by 85.5% and that both the integer and non-integer harmonic errors were effectively compensated. It lays the foundation for gear precision hobbing. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available