4.3 Article

Subcutaneous priming of protein-functionalized chitosan scaffolds improves function following spinal cord injury

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110656

Keywords

Neural stem cells; Spinal cord injury; Gait analysis; Intracellular sigma peptide; Tissue engineering

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R21NS096571-01]
  2. Craig H. Neilsen Foundation
  3. [P40OD011062]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strategies using neural stem cells (NSCs) to aid regeneration following spinal cord injury (SCI) show much promise, but challenges remain regarding implementation and efficacy. In this work, we explored the use of an NSC-seeded scaffold consisting of covalently immobilized interferon-gamma and rat NSCs within a hydrogel matrix (methacrylamide chitosan). We placed the scaffolds within the subcutaneous environment of rats, allowing them to incubate for 4 weeks in order to prime them for regeneration prior to being transplanted into a right lateral hemisection SCI model in the same animal. We found that subcutaneous priming reduced the lineage commitment of encapsulated NSCs, as observed by increased nestin expression and decreased NeuN expression. When combined with intracellular sigma peptide administration (which reduces inhibition from the glial scar), subcutaneous maturation improved functional outcomes, which were assessed by BBB score and quantitative gait parameters (fore and hind limb duty factor imbalance, right and left paw placement accuracy). Although we did not observe any direct reconnection of the transplanted cells with the host tissue, we did observe neurofilament fibers extending from the host tissue into the scaffold. Importantly, the mechanism for improved functional outcomes is likely an increase in trophic support from subcutaneously maturing the scaffold, which is enhanced by the administration of ISP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available