4.3 Article

Abundance and site fidelity of bottlenose dolphins off a remote oceanic island (Reunion Island, southwest Indian Ocean)

Journal

MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 871-896

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mms.12693

Keywords

abundance; common bottlenose dolphins; generalized affiliation indice; Indian Ocean; Jolly-Seber; lagged identification rate; mark-recapture; residency pattern; Reunion Island; Tursiops truncatus

Funding

  1. Conseil Regional de La Reunion
  2. DEAL Reunion
  3. European Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study represents the first comprehensive assessment of the population dynamics and residency of common bottlenose dolphin around Reunion Island (southwest Indian Ocean). Understanding dynamics and movement patterns of this local population is essential to guide effective conservation efforts, notably in a context of growing dolphin-watching activities. Dedicated surveys based on photo-identification methods were conducted over 6 years (2010-2015). The species was present year-round, in groups of 25 individuals on average (1-150). Jolly-Seber mark-recapture models resulted in a population estimate of 254 individuals (95% CI = 191-337) and an apparent annual survival rate of 0.83. The population was almost equally split into three residency patterns: residents (33.1%), long-term visitors (32.6%), and short-term visitors (34.3%, including transients, i.e., individuals only seen once [14.9%]), suggesting that the majority of the population showed a moderate-to-high level of residency in the study area. Individuals from the three residency patterns associated randomly, mixing together and forming a single community. Models based on the lagged identification rate indicated emigration and reimmigration to the survey area, with some individuals occupying the study area for about 2 years (832 days), and remaining outside for an average of 276 days, probably exhibiting larger home ranges and extensive movement behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available