4.1 Article

Accuracy of Bilistick (a Point-of-Care Device) to Detect Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages 630-636

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmaa026

Keywords

neonatal jaundice; bilirubin; Bilistick; hyperbilirubinemia; point-of-care device

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Early diagnosis and appropriate management of neonatal jaundice is crucial in avoiding severe hyperbilirubinemia and brain injury. A low-cost, minimally invasive, point-of-care (PoC) tool for total bilirubin (TB) estimation which can be useful across all ranges of bilirubin values and all settings is the need of the hour. Objective: To assess the accuracy of Bilistick system, a PoC device, for measurement of TB in comparison with estimation by spectrophotometry. Design/methods: In this cross-sectional clinical study, in infants who required TB estimation, blood samples in 25-mu l sample transfer pipettes were collected at the same time from venous blood obtained for laboratory bilirubin estimation. The accuracy of Bilistick in estimating TB within +/- 2 mg/dl of bilirubin estimation by spectrophotometry was the primary outcome. Results: Among the enrolled infants, 198 infants were eligible for study analysis with the mean gestation of 36 +/- 2.3 weeks and the mean birth weight of 2368 +/- 623 g. The median age at enrollment was 68.5 h (interquartile range: 48-92). Bilistick was accurate only in 54.5% infants in measuring TB within +/- 2 mg/dl difference of TB measured by spectrophotometry. There was a moderate degree of correlation between the two methods (r = 0.457; 95% CI: 0.339-0.561, p value < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.5 mg/dl (SD +/- 4.4) with limits of agreement between -8.2 and +9.1 mg/dl. Conclusion: Bilistick as a PoC device is not accurate to estimate TB within the clinically acceptable difference (+/- 2 mg/dl) of TB estimation by spectrophotometry and needs further improvement to make it more accurate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available