4.7 Article

Enhancing the cycling stability of the polyaniline hybrids benefited from the hollow manganese dioxide/acetylene black skeleton

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 290, Issue -, Pages 361-370

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.01.069

Keywords

Hollow; Polyaniline; PANI; Supercapacitor; Manganese dioxide

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51202115, 11274138, 10604020, 21571080]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyaniline (PANI) can be regarded as the most promising pseudocapacitive material for using as super capacitor electrodes. However, its poor cycling stability has become the major obstacle limiting its practical applications. In this study, we have successfully improved the cycling stability of PANI-based supercapacitor by designing the PANI-acetylene black (PANI-AB) hybrid nanostructures assisted by MnO2 nanotubes as sacrificial templates with a simple and low-cost method. The hybrid nanocomposites can exhibit good long-term cycling stability and 86% of the capacitance can be retained after 1000 cycles by CV test at a scan rate of 50 mV s(-1) compared to that of pure PANI-based supercapacitors. Furthermore, the PANI-5%AB hollowed hybrids also exhibit much better electrochemical performance (520 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1)) than that of pure PANI pseudocapacitors (271 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1)). The as-prepared full cells based on the hybrid structures can be further demonstrated that the PANI-5%AB based electrodes can have promising performance with high power density of 1361 W kg(-1) and energy density of 17.8 W h kg(-1) at current density of 2 A g(-1),even 6.32 kW kg(-1) and 14.1 W h kg(-1) at high current density of 10 A g(-1). The supercapacitor performances demonstrate that PANI-5%AB hybrid nanocomposites are very promising for high-performance electrochemical supercapacitor application. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available