4.7 Article

Natural convection of composite nanofluids based on a two-phase lattice Boltzmann model

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 141, Issue 1, Pages 277-287

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-09519-9

Keywords

Natural convection; Composite nanofluids; Lattice Boltzmann method

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [51606214]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20181359]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A two-phase lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is used to study the natural convection heat exchange characteristics of Al2O3-H2O nanofluids and (Al2O3/Cu)-H2O composite nanofluids in a rectangular cavity in this paper. It can be found that the two-phase LBM is suitable for the study on natural convection heat exchange characteristics of nanofluids, and its correctness is verified. Firstly, the effects of temperature differences ( increment T = 1 K and increment T = 11 K), nanofluids volume fractions (phi = 0.01, 0.03 and 0.05) and kinds of fluid (water, Al2O3-H2O nanofluids and Al2O3/Cu-H2O nanofluids) on the free convection are researched. Then, temperature and streamline distributions of Al2O3/Cu-H2O nanofluids are investigated, respectively. Lastly, local Nusselt number and average Nusselt number distributions of different nanofluids along with Y direction are investigated. It can be found that Al2O3/Cu-H2O nanofluids show a larger enhancement than Al2O3-H2O nanofluids and water. Al2O3/Cu-H2O and Al2O3-H2O nanofluids can strengthen the heat transfer performance by 9.9% and 5% at the extreme compared with deionized water, respectively. Besides, the maximum enhancement ratio of Al2O3/Cu-H2O and Al2O3-H2O nanofluids is 9.8% and 4.5% at small temperature difference (Delta T = 1 K), respectively, which is greater than that (1.6% and 0.36%) at big temperature difference (Delta T = 11 K).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available