4.7 Article

Preparation, characterization and properties of PVDF-g-PAMPS/PMMA-co-PAMPS/silica nanoparticle as a new proton exchange nanocomposite membrane

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages 1035-1048

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.048

Keywords

PVDF graft copolymer; Nanocomposite; Proton exchange membrane; Sulfonic acid functionalized silica nanoparticle; PMMA-co-PAMPS copolymer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, preparation and characterization of PVDF/PMMA-co-PAMPS/silica nanocomposite membranes as a new proton exchange membrane were investigated. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) containing pendant sulfonic acid groups was synthesized by grafting through RAFT polymerization of 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-propanesulfonic acid (AMPS) from vinyl pendent groups of already modified PVDF as a macro-monomer. The synthesized PVDF graft copolymer (PVDF-g-PAMPS) was blended with miscible copolymer containing sulfonated segments (PMMA-co-PAMPS) and sulfonic acid functionalized silica nanoparticles in order to achieve high performance nanocornposite proton exchange membrane. It was found that the addition of PMMA-co-PAMPS copolymer resulted in a significant increase in porosity and slight reduction in crystallinity of the nanocomposite membranes, which favored the water uptake and proton transport at ambient temperature. Both the water uptake and the ion-exchange capacity (IEC) of the nanocomposite membranes were increased by increasing silica nanoparticles loading. The maximum proton conductivity was 20 mS/cm at 25 degrees C for the nanocomposite membrane containing 10% silica nanoparticles. Also, this nanocomposite membrane showed a power density as high as 34.3 mW/cm(2) at peak current density of 140 mA/cm(2). The thermal and mechanical properties of these nanocomposite membranes were also studied. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available