4.7 Article

Removal of chlorpheniramine in a nanoscale zero-valent iron induced heterogeneous Fenton system: Influencing factors and degradation intermediates

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages 1058-1067

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.042

Keywords

Chlorpheniramine; nZVI induced heterogeneous Fenton system; Influencing factor; Degradation intermediate; NDMA FP reduction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50878165, 51408422]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012KJ019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Removal of chlorpheniramine in a nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) induced heterogeneous Fenton system was investigated. The removal efficiency of chlorpheniramine depended on its initial concentration, initial pH, H2O2 concentration and nZVI dose. Chlorpheniramine (<= 15 mg/L) was completely removed after 60 min oxidation under the following optimal conditions: initial pH = 3.0, H2O2 concentration = 0.1 mM and nZVI dose = 22.4 mg/L. The degradation of chlorpheniramine fitted well with the pseudo first-order kinetics model, and the rate constants (k(obs)) were obtained (R-2 > 0.9). Several degradation intermediates of chlorpheniramine were detected and confirmed, including 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone, 2-methylaminopyridine, 4-chlorophenol, 2-propionylpyridine, 2-acetylpyridine, 4-chlorophenyl-2-pyridyl ketone, dimethylamine (DMA) and N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA). Based on the identified intermediates, a tentative degradation pathway of chlorpheniramine in the nZVI/H2O2 system was proposed. After nZVI/H2O2 reaction, 52.2% of NDMA formation potential (FP) from chlorpheniramine was reduced. Therefore, nZVI as the catalyst used in the heterogeneous Fenton system is not only an alternative to remove chlorpheniramine, but also effective in reducing NDMA FP. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available