4.7 Article

Effect of reused alum-humic-flocs on coagulation performance and floc characteristics formed by aluminum salt coagulants in humic-acid water

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 287, Issue -, Pages 225-232

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.017

Keywords

Humic acid (HA); Alum-humic-floc (AHF); Dual coagulant; Floc characteristics; Coagulation mechanism

Funding

  1. Funds for Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2012ZX07408001, 2014ZX07405002]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (HIT) [2013DX12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recycled alum sludge was used as a coagulant aid with poly aluminum chloride (PACl) and aluminum sulfate (Al-2(SO4)(3)) in the evaluation of coagulation behavior and floc structure of humic acid (HA)-rich solutions. The alum sludge, alum-humic-floc (AHF), was produced under coagulation jar test conditions. The dual coagulants, PACl-AHF and Al-2(SO4)(3)-AHF, were obtained by dosing AHF 30 s after traditional coagulants were added. Due to the lack of apparent changes in zeta potential values, physical adsorption was likely the primary mechanism by which AHF removed organic matter. Charge neutralization was not the only dominant mechanism for the dual coagulants in the coagulation process; entrapment and adsorption also played significant roles. The addition of AHF played a significant role in improving floc structure and developing flocs with larger sizes and fractal dimensions, especially at the steady state stage. Floc breakage was also shown to induce the release of organic matter into solution, regardless of the coagulant type, and re-growth processes facilitated the additional removal of organic matter. The regenerated flocs with larger sizes and more compact structure could be used as adsorbents to further remove organic matter. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available