4.7 Article

Degradation of boscalid by nitrogen-doped/undoped TiO2 and persulfate ions using different activation conditions and the identification of its main degradation products using LC/MS/MS

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 288, Issue -, Pages 845-857

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.053

Keywords

Degradation; Boscalid; Persulfate; TiO2; Intermediates; LC/MS/MS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The degradation of boscalid (Bd) in an aqueous solution was studied using different oxidation systems, including the persulfate ion (PS), TiO2 (UT), N-TiO2 (NT) and mixtures of UT/PS and NT/PS under sunlight irradiation, in addition to using heat-activated (50 or 80 degrees C) PS ions. NT exhibited a higher percent Bd degradation than UT, which was explained by a higher surface area and a higher amount of anatase for NT. However, the NT/PS or UT/PS systems did not degrade Bd as much as PS alone under sunlight, which may be a result of interactions between the produced hydroxyl and sulfate radicals. Eventually, the highest Bd degradation was obtained by the activation of PS at 80 degrees C. However, the degradation of Bd by NT or UT in an aqueous solution containing MeOH was completely inhibited. MeOH is a scavenger for hydroxyl radicals, OH center dot and the positive holes of activated catalysts. In addition, the PS system was influenced more than the UT/PS and NT/PS systems were in the presence of MeOH. This result can be explained by the facts that (i) MeOH scavenged more OH center dot than SO4 center dot-, and (ii) more SO4 center dot- was present for the UT/PS and NT/PS systems than for the PS. Therefore, the NT/PS and UT/PS systems showed a higher percent Bd degradation in an aqueous solution containing MeOH than the PS system did. Eventually, an analysis of the Bd residues was carried out using LC/MS/MS, and the seven basic intermediates were identified. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available