4.7 Article

Adsorption properties of NO and NH3 over MnOx based catalyst supported on γ-Al2O3

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 302, Issue -, Pages 570-576

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.092

Keywords

MnO; SCR; Adsorption; Density functional theory (DFT)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51576086, 51576081]
  2. Research Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [113045A]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2015CFB191]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx with NH3 has been widely applied to reduce the emission of NOx from the power plants. MnOx based SCR catalysts have also been attracted more attention because of its several unstable valence states. But the detailed reaction mechanism is still controversial and lacks the related comparative study of molecule modeling. Since SCR reaction belongs to the gas-solid multiphase reaction, on which the adsorption of NH3 and NO on the catalysts surface would play an important role. The present study aims to probe the adsorption mechanism of NH3 and NO on the MnOx based catalysts supported on gamma-Al2O3. MnO2 and Mn2O3 were supported separately on the gamma-Al2O3 (110) surface, and the adsorption properties of NH3 and NO on these stable configurations were then conducted. The results shows that NO can be adsorbed stably and form different nitrite or nitrate species on the gamma-Al2O3 (110) surface supported MnO2 or Mn2O3. NH3 was easily adsorbed as the coordinated NH3 on different active sites. All these calculations results are in good agreement with the experimental results. It revealed that the DFT investigation is practical in mechanism study and can provide further understandings in reaction mechanism which can hardly approach by experimental methods. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available