4.6 Review

Photoprotection beyond ultraviolet radiation: A review of tinted sunscreens

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 5, Pages 1393-1397

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.079

Keywords

iron oxide; photoprotection; tinted sunscreen; titanium dioxide; ultraviolet light; visible light

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

UV radiation and visible light have biologic effects on the skin, with visible light causing erythema and pigmentation. Broad-spectrum sunscreens protect against UV radiation but not visible light. Tinted sunscreens use different formulations to provide protection against visible light for various skin types, making them beneficial for conditions such as photodermatoses and hyperpigmentation disorders.
Ultraviolet radiation and visible light both have biologic effects on the skin. Visible light can induce erythema in light-skinned individuals and pigmentation in dark-skinned individuals. Broad-spectrum sunscreens protect against ultraviolet radiation but do not adequately protect against visible light. For a sunscreen to protect against visible light, it must be visible on the skin. Inorganic filters (also known as mineral filters), namely, zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, are used in the form of nanoparticles in sunscreens to minimize the chalky and white appearance on the skin; as such, they do not protect against visible light. Tinted sunscreens use different formulations and concentrations of iron oxides and pigmentary titanium dioxide to provide protection against visible light. Many shades of tinted sunscreens are available by combining different amounts of iron oxides and pigmentary titanium dioxide to cater to all skin phototypes. Therefore, tinted sunscreens are beneficial for patients with visible lighteinduced photodermatoses and those with hyperpigmentation disorders such as melasma and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available