4.5 Article

The effects of quartz Dauphine twinning on strain localization in a mid-crustal shear zone

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2020.103980

Keywords

Dauphine twins; Quartz; EBSD; Grain boundary migration; Microstructure; Transpression; Fiordland

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR 1650219]
  2. CSUN Dept. of Geological Sciences: the Hanna Summer Student Research Award
  3. Hanna Graduate Fellowship
  4. Larry Collins Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use microstructural, electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), and crystal vorticity axis (CVA) analyses to evaluate the effects of quartz Dauphine twinning on strain localization. We compare a granodiorite mylonite and a tonalite mylonite from the Grebe Shear Zone, a mid-crustal transpressional shear zone in Fiordland, New Zealand. EBSD analysis reveals identical quartz grain boundary migration dynamic recrystallization microstructures in both samples, with abundant Dauphine twinning only in the granodiorite mylonite. Bulk CVA patterns further distinguish the untwinned and Dauphine-twinned samples, indicating a transition from simple shear-to pure shear-dominated transpression, respectively. The quartz CVA pattern from the Dauphine-twinned sample indicates that twinned and untwinned grains record a transition from simple shear-to pure shear-dominated deformation, respectively. Pole figures of the Dauphine-twinned sample reveal high-temperature slip systems in the untwinned and Dauphine-twinned grains. We conclude that Dauphine twinning formed early in transpression, and rendered the twinned grains less deformable relative to the untwinned grains over time. The effectiveness of Dauphine twinning in localizing strain is therefore strongly influenced by its timing relative to the evolving shear zone kinematic deformation geometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available