- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Lorentz violation effects in 2νββ decay
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS G-NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 055112
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Online
2020-03-11
DOI
10.1088/1361-6471/ab7e8c
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Detailed studies of $$^{100}$$ 100 Mo two-neutrino double beta decay in NEMO-3
- (2019) R. Arnold et al. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
- Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Experiments With TeO2 Low-Temperature Detectors
- (2019) Chiara Brofferio et al. Frontiers in Physics
- Reexamining the light neutrino exchange mechanism of the0νββdecay with left- and right-handed leptonic and hadronic currents
- (2015) Dušan Štefánik et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW C
- Test of Lorentz invariance with atmospheric neutrinos
- (2015) K. Abe et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Review of Particle Physics
- (2014) K.A. Olive Chinese Physics C
- New determination of double-β-decay properties in48Ca: High-precisionQββ-value measurement and improved nuclear matrix element calculations
- (2014) A. A. Kwiatkowski et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW C
- Limits on Lorentz andCPTviolation from double beta decay
- (2014) Jorge S. Díaz PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Neutrinos as Probes of Lorentz Invariance
- (2014) Jorge S. Díaz Advances in High Energy Physics
- First direct determination of the48Cadouble-βdecayQvalue
- (2013) S. Bustabad et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW C
- New calculations for phase space factors involved in double-βdecay
- (2013) Sabin Stoica et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW C
- Relativity violations and beta decay
- (2013) Jorge S. Díaz et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- First Direct Double-βDecayQ-Value Measurement ofSe82in Support of Understanding the Nature of the Neutrino
- (2013) David L. Lincoln et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Atomic mass and double-β-decayQvalue of48Ca
- (2012) Matthew Redshaw et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW C
- Phase-space factors for double-βdecay
- (2012) J. Kotila et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW C
- Search for Lorentz invariance andCPTviolation with muon antineutrinos in the MINOS Near Detector
- (2012) P. Adamson et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- First test of Lorentz violation with a reactor-based antineutrino experiment
- (2012) Y. Abe et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- QValue and Half-Lives for the Double-β-Decay NuclidePd110
- (2012) D. Fink et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Test of Lorentz and CPT violation with short baseline neutrino oscillation excesses
- (2012) A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- Theory of neutrinoless double-beta decay
- (2012) J D Vergados et al. REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS
- Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam
- (2012) T. Adam et al. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
- Double-beta decay Q values of 116Cd and 130Te
- (2011) S. Rahaman et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- Data tables for Lorentz andCPTviolation
- (2011) V. Alan Kostelecký et al. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS
- Double-β-decayQvalues ofSe74andGe76
- (2010) Brianna J. Mount et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW C
- Qvalue for the double-βdecay ofXe136
- (2010) P. M. McCowan et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW C
- Search for a Lorentz-violating sidereal signal with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube
- (2010) R. Abbasi et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Double-β-decayQvalues ofTe130,Te128, andTe120
- (2009) N. D. Scielzo et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW C
- Masses ofTe130andXe130and Double-β-DecayQValue ofTe130
- (2009) Matthew Redshaw et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Prospects for Large Relativity Violations in Matter-Gravity Couplings
- (2009) V. Alan Kostelecký et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Q values of the 76Ge and 100Mo double-beta decays
- (2008) S. Rahaman et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started