4.6 Article

Femtosecond laser micro-structuring of amorphous polyether(ether)ketone at 775 nm and 387 nm

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 53, Issue 36, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab8ed8

Keywords

amorphous PEEK; femtosecond laser; micro-machining; ablation threshold; multi-photon absorption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laser micro-structuring of amorphous polyether(ether)ketone (PEEK) has been demonstrated with 180 fs/1 kHz NIR (775 nm) and NUV (387 nm) laser pulses. Significant differences in laser-material interaction is observed between the NIR and NUV wavelengths with single pulse ablation threshold found to be 2.01 +/- 0.05 J cm(-2) and 0.23 +/- 0.02 J cm(-2) at 775 nm and 387 nm respectively. This is connected to the requirement for multi-photon absorption at 775 nm, where PEEK is transparent, while at 387 nm, significant linear absorption within the material bandgap occurs, favouring sequential 2-photon absorption via reverse saturated absorption (RSA). Open aperture Z scan data yields a 2-photon absorption coefficient beta(387)(I) which is intensity dependent, consistent with RSA. Multi-pulse exposure yields incubation coefficients of S-775 = 0.72 +/- 0.01 and S-387 = 0.85 +/- 0.02. This significant reduction in NUV incubation is consistent with a much higher level of electron excitation to the conduction band. Consequently, ablation of PEEK with NUV fs pulses is superior, exhibiting much reduced melting and re-deposition. Precision NUV polymer surface micro-structuring is accomplished while laser induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS) with pitch Lambda similar to 0.4 mu m are observed at the base of ablated regions, aligned parallel to the incident polarisation. The ease of NUV LIPSS generation allowed surface patterning of large scanned areas which exhibit white light diffraction due to this sub-micron periodic surface modulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available