4.6 Article

Assessment of Numerical Simulations of Deep Circulation and Variability in the Gulf of Mexico Using Recent Observations

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 1045-1064

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-19-0137.1

Keywords

Ocean circulation; Abyssal circulation; Bottom currents; bottom water; Eddies; Ocean models

Categories

Funding

  1. Gulf Research Program of the National Academy of Sciences [2000006422, 2000009966]
  2. CICESE-PetroleosMexicanos Grant [PEP-CICESE 428229851]
  3. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), U.S. Dept. of the Interior

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three simulations of the circulation in the Gulf of Mexico (the Gulf) using different numerical general circulation models are compared with results of recent large-scale observational campaigns conducted throughout the deep (>1500 m) Gulf. Analyses of these observations have provided new understanding of large-scale mean circulation features and variability throughout the deep Gulf. Important features include cyclonic flow along the continental slope, deep cyclonic circulation in the western Gulf, a counterrotating pair of cells under the Loop Current region, and a cyclonic cell to the south of this pair. These dominant circulation features are represented in each of the ocean model simulations, although with some obvious differences. A striking difference between all the models and the observations is that the simulated deep eddy kinetic energy under the Loop Current region is generally less than one-half of that computed from observations. A multidecadal integration of one of these numerical simulations is used to evaluate the uncertainty of estimates of velocity statistics in the deep Gulf computed from limited-length (4 years) observational or model records. This analysis shows that the main deep circulation features identified from the observational studies appear to be robust and are not substantially impacted by variability on time scales longer than the observational records. Differences in strengths and structures of the circulation features are identified, however, and quantified through standard error analysis of the statistical estimates using the model solutions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available