4.0 Article

Trametinib-based Treatment of Pediatric CNS Tumors: A Single Institutional Experience

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages E730-E737

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001819

Keywords

brain tumors; trametinib; targeted agents; MEK

Funding

  1. Gordon Fellowship in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Celebrating Futures Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MEK inhibitors are an emerging therapy with increasing use in mitogen-activated protein kinase-driven central nervous system (CNS) tumors. There is limited data regarding efficacy and toxicity in pediatric patients. We report our clinical experience with trametinib-based therapy for the treatment of 14 consecutive pediatric patients with recurrent low-grade glioma (N=11) or high-grade CNS tumors (N=3) with MAP kinase pathway mutations. Patients received trametinib as monotherapy (N=9) or in combination (N=5) with another antineoplastic agent. Nine patients (64%) were progression free during treatment. Five patients showed a partial response, while 4 had stable disease. Two patients (14%) progressed on therapy. All partial responses were in patients with low-grade tumors. The remaining 3 patients were not evaluable due to toxicity limiting duration of therapy. Two of 3 patients with low-grade glioma with leptomeningeal dissemination showed radiographic treatment response. Five patients reported improved clinical symptoms while on trametinib. Adverse events on trametinib-based therapy included dermatologic, mouth sores, fever, gastrointestinal, infection, neutropenia, headache, and fatigue, and were more common in patients using combination therapy. Trametinib-based therapy demonstrated signals of efficacy in our single institutional cohort of pediatric patients with mitogen-activated protein kinase-driven CNS tumors. Our observations need to be confirmed in a clinical trial setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available