4.5 Article

Effect of Doped Nano-Ni on Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Behavior of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu (SAC305)/Cu-2.0Be Solder Joint during Isothermal Aging

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 3315-3323

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-020-04838-2

Keywords

mechanical property; microstructure evolution; Ni nanoparticles; solder joint; thermal aging

Funding

  1. Key Laboratory Foundation of Metal Material Microstructure Control of Jiangxi Province [EJ201903064]
  2. Key Project of Jiangxi Superior Science and Technology Innovation Team [20181BCB19002]
  3. Key R&D Project of Jiangxi Science and Technology Department [20171BBE50010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Cu-2.0Be alloy is widely used as the substrate in the aircraft electronic device, which has a potential trend to replace the pure Cu substrate. However, few studies have investigated the influence of the doped Ni nanoparticles on interfacial reaction between Cu-2.0Be substrate and the SAC305 solder during isothermal aging. In this study, the effect of doped nano-Ni on microstructure evolution and mechanical behavior of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu (SAC305)/Cu-2.0Be solder joint during isothermal aging was studied. The result showed that the intermetallic compounds (IMCs) thickness of SAC305/Cu-2.0Be solder joint was thicker than that of SAC305-0.1Ni/Cu-2.0Be solder joint, which indicated that the composite solder's growth rate was smaller than that of monolithic solder. Furthermore, the SAC305-0.1Ni also had a smaller diffusion coefficient (1.65 x 10(-12) mu m(2)/s) than that of SAC305 (2.72 x 10(-12) mu m(2)/s). The SAC305-0.1Ni/Cu-2.0Be solder joint showed better mechanical property than that of SAC305/Cu-2.0Be solder joint. It indicated that a trace amount of Ni nanoparticle could hinder interfacial IMC layer's growth effectively. Therefore, SAC305-0.1Ni solder alloy is a promising potential solder alloy in electronic packaging field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available