4.7 Article

Role of PstS in the Pathogenesis of Acinetobacter baumannii Under Microaerobiosis and Normoxia

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 222, Issue 7, Pages 1204-1212

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa201

Keywords

microaerobiosis; Acinetobacter baumannii; virulence factors; PstS

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdireccion General de Redes y Centros de Investigacion Cooperativa, Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad [PIE13/0004, FPU13/04545, CP15/00132]
  2. Plan Nacional de I + D + i 2013-2016, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases
  3. European Development Regional Fund A Way to Achieve Europe, operative program Intelligent Growth 2014-2020 [RD12/0015/0001, RD12/0015/0012, RD16/0016/0009]
  4. Program Nicolas Monardes, Andalusian Health Service, Ministry of Health and Families

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acinetobacter baumannii is a successful pathogen responsible for infections with high mortality rate. During the course of infection it can be found in microaerobic environments, which influences virulence factor expression. From a previous transcriptomic analysis of A. baumannii ATCC 17978 under microaerobiosis, we know the gene pstS is overexpressed under microaerobiosis. Here, we studied its role in A. baumannii virulence. pstS loss significantly decreased bacterial adherence and invasion into A549 cells and increased A549 cell viability. pstS loss also reduced motility and biofilm-forming ability of A. baumannii. In a peritoneal sepsis murine model, the minimum lethal dose required by A. baumannii ATCC 17978 Delta pstS was lower compared to the wild type (4.3 vs 3.2 log colony forming units/mL, respectively), and the bacterial burden in tissues and fluids was lower. Thus, the loss of the phosphate sensor PstS produced a decrease in A. baumannii pathogenesis, supporting its role as a virulence factor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available