4.4 Article

Glacier mass and area changes on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, 1986-2016

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 258, Pages 603-617

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2020.32

Keywords

Alaska; climate change; glacier; Kenai Peninsula; mass balance; remote sensing

Funding

  1. Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDY-SSW-DQC02, QYZDJ-SSW-DQC039]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19070501]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41721091]
  5. state Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science [SKLCS-ZZ-2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glacier mass loss in Alaska has implications for global sea level rise, fresh water input into the Gulf of Alaska and terrestrial fresh water resources. We map all glaciers (>4000 km(2)) on the Kenai Peninsula, south central Alaska, for the years 1986, 1995, 2005 and 2016, using satellite images. Changes in surface elevation and volume are determined by differencing a digital elevation model (DEM) derived from Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer stereo images in 2005 from the Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar DEM of 2014. The glacier area shrunk by 543 +/- 123 km(2)(12 +/- 3%) between 1986 and 2016. The region-wide mass-balance rate between 2005 and 2014 was -0.94 +/- 0.12 m w.e. a(-1)(-3.84 +/- 0.50 Gt a(-1)), which is almost twice as negative than found for earlier periods in previous studies indicating an acceleration in glacier mass loss in this region. Area-averaged mass changes were most negative for lake-terminating glaciers (-1.37 +/- 0.13 m w.e. a(-1)), followed by land-terminating glaciers (-1.02 +/- 0.13 m w.e. a(-1)) and tidewater glaciers (-0.45 +/- 0.14 m w.e. a(-1)). Unambiguous attribution of the observed acceleration in mass loss over the last decades is hampered by the scarcity of observational data, especially at high elevation, and by large interannual variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available