4.6 Article

Extraction for profiling free and bound phenolic compounds in tea seed oil by deep eutectic solvents

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages 1450-1461

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.15019

Keywords

bound phenolic compounds; deep eutectic solvents; extraction; free phenolic compounds; tea seed oil

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [31601403]
  2. Fujian Science & Technology Program [2017N5010]
  3. Promotion Program for Young and Middle-aged Teacher in Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University [ZQN-PY417]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bound phenolic compounds have rarely been reported in vegetable oils and this may be due to little research about the extraction. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs), recently applied in the extraction of phenolic compounds as alternatives to organic solvents, were adopted in the extraction of free and bound phenolic compounds from tea seed oil in this work. First, the phenolic compounds were analyzed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with quadrupole-time-of-flight and triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS) for characterization and UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS for quantification and 25 phenolic compounds were found to exist in both free and bound forms. Then, DESs were screened for extraction of free and bound phenolic compounds from tea seed oil as the pretreatment for analysis and the results showed that hydrogen bond donors (HBDs) and temperature significantly affected the extraction efficiency of DESs. Finally, free phenolic compounds (83.91 mu g/g) and bound phenolic compounds (25.71 mu g/g), extracted by the DES with glycerol as HBD at 50 degrees C, were 51.0% and 93.2% higher than those extracted by methanol/water (60%, v/v), respectively. This work not only advanced the basic data of phenolic compounds in tea seed oil but also explored an efficient extraction method for scientific analysis of free and bound phenolic compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available