4.8 Article

Diminished hepatic IFN response following HCV clearance triggers HBV reactivation in coinfection

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages 3205-3220

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI135616

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH
  2. Japanese Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [19fk0310109h0003, 19fk0210020h0003]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 107-3017-F-002-002]
  4. Center of Precision Medicine from the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan [NTU-107L9014-1]
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [ZIADK054500, ZIADK054505] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In patients with HBV and HCV coinfection, HBV reactivation leading to severe hepatitis has been reported with the use of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) to treat HCV infection. Here we studied the molecular mechanisms behind this viral interaction. In coinfected cell culture and humanized mice, HBV replication was suppressed by HCV coinfection. In vitro, HBV suppression was attenuated when interferon (IFN) signaling was blocked. In vivo, HBV viremia, after initial suppression by HCV superinfection, rebounded following HCV clearance by DAA treatment that was accompanied by a reduced hepatic IFN response. Using blood samples of coinfected patients, IFN-stimulated gene products including C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10), C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were identified to have predictive value for HBV reactivation after HCV clearance. Taken together, our data suggest that HBV reactivation is a result of diminished hepatic IFN response following HCV clearance and identify serologic markers that can predict HBV reactivation in DAA-treated HBV-HCV-coinfected persons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available