4.5 Article

Sex differences in scores on standardized measures of autism symptoms: a multisite integrative data analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 97-106

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13242

Keywords

Sex differences; autism spectrum disorder; restricted and repetitive behavior; social impairment

Funding

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01HD093012, R01HD081199]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH081873]
  3. Autism Science Foundation [ASP-002]
  4. NIMH [ZIC-MH002961]
  5. Autism Speaks
  6. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  7. Kids Brain Health
  8. Sinneave Family Foundation
  9. Alberta Innovates Health Solutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After controlling for age, IQ, and language level, sex may have a minimal impact on the estimates of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) severity. Boys may exhibit more severe symptoms in certain areas compared to girls, while girls may show more severity in other aspects, particularly emerging during adolescence.
Background Concerns have been raised that scores on standard measures of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) symptoms may differ as a function of sex. However, these findings are hindered by small female samples studied thus far. The current study evaluated if, after accounting for age, IQ, and language level, sex affects ASD severity estimates from diagnostic measures among children with ASD. Methods Data were obtained from eight sources comprising 27 sites. Linear mixed-effects models, including a random effect for site, were fit for 10 outcomes (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule [ADOS] domain-level calibrated severity scores, Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised [ADI-R] raw scores by age-based algorithm, and raw scores from the two indices on the Social Responsiveness Scale [SRS]). Sex was added to the models after controlling for age, NVIQ, and an indicator for language level. Results Sex significantly improved model fit for half of the outcomes, but least square mean differences were generally negligible (effect sizes [ES] < 0.20), increasing to small to moderate in adolescence (ES < 0.40). Boys received more severe RRB scores than girls on both the ADOS and ADI-R (age 4 + algorithm), and girls received more severe scores than boys on both SRS indices, which emerged in adolescence. Conclusions This study combined several available databases to create the largest sample of girls with ASD diagnoses. We found minimal differences due to sex beyond other known influences on ASD severity indicators. This may suggest that, among children who ultimately receive a clinical ASD diagnosis, severity estimates do not systematically differ to such an extent that sex-specific scoring procedures would be necessary. However, given the limitations inherent in clinically ascertained samples, future research must address questions about systematic sex differences among children or adults who do not receive clinical diagnoses of ASD. Moreover, while the current study helps resolve questions about widely used diagnostic instruments, we could not address sex differences in phenotypic aspects outside of these scores.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available