4.2 Article

In silico analysis of the relation between conventional and high-power short-duration RF ablation settings and resulting lesion metrics

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 1332-1339

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jce.14495

Keywords

ablation; contact force; high-power short-duration; lesion; radiofrequency

Funding

  1. German Heart Foundation
  2. French Government as part of the Investments of the Future program [ANR-10-IAHU-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Use of lesion metric indices is a proposed strategy to support pulmonary vein isolation procedures and these indices show good correlations with lesion sizes. The aim of this in silico study is to provide a detailed analysis of radiofrequency (RF) settings, including high-power short-duration (HPSD) settings, and resulting lesion metric indices. Methods and Results A software program was designed which simulated virtual RF ablations. Lesion metric indices (Ablation index: AI, Lesion size index: LSI) were calculated based on underlying RF settings (contact force [CF], power, duration). In series of calculations, the applied settings were varied within defined ranges (CF: 1-80 g, power: 1-60 W, duration: 1-60 seconds). Overall, n = 388 000 virtual ablations were calculated. The resulting lesion metric indices were compared with each other and analyzed in relation to respective RF settings. Increasing contact force from 1 to 10 g resulted in a 4.4-fold LSI value, whilst increasing contact force from 10 to 20g resulted in a 1.5-fold value (P < .01). When RF power was increased by 10 W, lesion metric indices increased between 1.3- and 1.6-fold. A prolongation of RF duration by 10 seconds resulted in a 1.2-to-1.3-fold increase of lesion metric indices. HPSD RF applications of 50 W, 11 to 13 seconds, and 60 W, 8 to 10 seconds resulted in equivalent lesion metric indices when compared with 30 W, 30 seconds conventional ablations. Conclusions The findings support the clinical use of contact forces within a 10 to 20 g range. AI is more sensitive to RF duration, whereas LSI is more sensitive to contact force. HPSD RF settings can successfully be derived from lesion metric indices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available