4.6 Article

Distinct Corticocortical Contributions to Human Precision and Power Grip

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 5070-5082

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw291

Keywords

corticospinal volleys; I-waves; grasping; primary motor cortex; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Categories

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS076589, R01 NS090622] Funding Source: Medline
  2. RRD VA [I01 RX000815] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The corticospinal tract contributes to the control of finger muscles during precision and power grip. The involvement of different sets of cortical interneuronal circuits during these distinct grasping behaviors remains unknown. To examine this question in humans we used noninvasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand representation of the primary motor cortex to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in an intrinsic finger muscle during index finger abduction (control task), precision grip, and power grip. The TMS coil was oriented to induce currents in the brain in the latero-medial (LM), posterior-anterior (PA), and anterior-posterior (AP) direction to preferentially activate corticospinal axons directly and early and late synaptic inputs to corticospinal neurons, respectively. We found that AP-LM MEP latency differences were consistently longer during power grip compared with index finger abduction and precision grip, while PA-LM differences remained similar across tasks. Short-interval intracortical facilitation, targeting AP but not PA inputs, increased during power grip compared with other tasks. Our novel findings suggest that cortical structures activated by PA and AP stimuli are differentially active during precision and power grip. We propose that a preferential recruitment of late synaptic inputs to corticospinal neurons may be achieved when humans perform a power grip.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available