4.6 Article

Response Patterns of GABAergic Neurons in the Anterior Piriform Cortex of Awake Mice

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 3110-3124

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw175

Keywords

cortical circuitry; head-fixed; multichannel recording; optical tagging; sensory processing

Categories

Funding

  1. National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Program) [2014CB548200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91432113]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Local inhibition by gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA)-containing neurons is of vital importance for the operation of sensory cortices. However, the physiological response patterns of cortical GABAergic neurons are poorly understood, especially in the awake condition. Here, we utilized the recently developed optical tagging technique to specifically record GABAergic neurons in the anterior piriform cortex (aPC) in awake mice. The identified aPC GABAergic neurons were stimulated with robotic delivery of 32 distinct odorants, which covered a broad range of functional groups. We found that aPC GABAergic neurons could be divided into 4 types based on their response patterns. Type I, type II, and type III neurons displayed broad excitatory responses to test odorants with different dynamics. Type I neurons were constantly activated during odorant stimulation, whereas type II neurons were only transiently activated at the onset of odorant delivery. In addition, type III neurons displayed transient excitatory responses both at the onset and termination of odorant presentation. Interestingly, type IV neurons were broadly inhibited by most of the odorants. Taken together, aPC GABAergic neurons adopt different strategies to affect the cortical circuitry. Our results will allow for better understanding of the role of cortical GABAergic interneurons in sensory information processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available