4.7 Article

Co-pyrolysis characteristics of polysaccharides-cellulose and the co-pyrolyzed compound distributions over two kinds of zeolite catalysts

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 8, Pages 6350-6362

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.5360

Keywords

cellulose; co-pyrolysis; DFT; polysaccharides; zeolite

Funding

  1. 333 project in Jiangsu Province [BRA2019277]
  2. CAS Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy [Y907k41001]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019T120408]
  4. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion [FSKLCCA1904]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676091]
  6. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [SJKY19_2551]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Co-pyrolysis characteristics of soluble polysaccharides-cellulose were investigated through thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), kinetic analysis, analytical pyrolyser coupled with gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (Py-GC/MS) and subsequent density functional theory (DFT). Results from TGA and differential thermogravimetric analysis (DTG) analyses indicated that there were synergistic effects in the polysaccharides-cellulose (PS-CE) blends pyrolysis process. Surprisingly in co-pyrolysis process from Py-GC/MS analysis, the furans were suppressed, while the anhydrosugars were increased. The DFT calculation showed that free radicals pyrolyzed from soluble polysaccharides could suppress the ring-opening reaction of D-glucopyranose. The co-pyrolyzed chemical compound distribution over the catalysts (MCM-41, ZSM-5 and their mixtures) was also detected through Py-GC/MS analysis. Both the zeolites showed high selectivity for 5-methyl-2-furaldehyde and 2-furaldehyde. The two kinds of zeolites could induce the generation of furans but suppress the production of anhydrosugars, which was the opposite effect of the co-pyrolysis of PS-CE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available