4.3 Article

Phase II study of 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin plus bevacizumab for chemotherapy-naive older or frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (OGSG 0802)

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 1291-1298

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01656-3

Keywords

5-fluorouracil; Bevacizumab; Older; Frail; Metastatic colorectal cancer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Older or frail patients are often underrepresented in clinical trials for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We here assessed the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-leucovorin plus bevacizumab in such patients. Methods The study (OGSG 0802) was designed as a single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial. Eligible patients had mCRC and at least one of the following: an age of >= 65 years, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or 2, a serum albumin level of <= 3.5 g/dL, incompatibility with oxaliplatin or irinotecan, and a history of abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy. Patients received 5-FU (600 mg/m(2)) and l-leucovorin (200 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, and 15 together with bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results Forty-one patients were enrolled and eligible. Median age was 76 years (range 56-90 years), and 51% of patients had a performance status of 0. The ORR was 36.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.1-53.1%], median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI 7.4-17.7 months), and median OS was 24.0 months (95% CI 19.9 months-not reached). The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade >= 3 were neutropenia (24%), anorexia (10%), leukopenia (7%), and mucositis/stomatitis (7%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion Weekly 5-FU-leucovorin with biweekly bevacizumab may be a tolerable and effective treatment option for older or frail patients with mCRC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available