4.7 Article

Dutasteride nanocapsules for hair follicle targeting: Effect of chitosan-coating and physical stimulus

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.143

Keywords

Alopecia; Chitosan; Nanoparticle

Funding

  1. FAPDF (Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa do Distrito Federal)
  2. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  3. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In general, nanometer-sized drug delivery systems have a natural tendency for accommodation in the follicular cavities, which makes them advantageous in the treatment of conditions affecting these structures. Still, follicular targeting enhancement can improve therapy outcomes. Here, we compare two strategies to further promote dutasteride follicular-targeted delivery: the chemical modulation of nanosystem surface properties by coating with the natural polymer chitosan, and the application of a massage. For this, poly-(epsilon-caprolactone)-lipid-core nanocapsules (NC) containing dutasteride were developed and had their permeation profile compared to chitosan-coated nanocapsules (NC-CS). Nanocapsules showed high drug encapsulation efficiency (>94%), and stability for up to 90 days of storage. As expected, chitosan coating increased the size and zeta potential, from 199.0 +/- 0.5 nm (Pdl of 0.12) and - 13.6 +/- 0.6 mV to 224.9 +/- 3.4 nm (Pdl 023) and + 40.2 +/- 0.8 mV, respectively. Both coated and non-coated nanopartides targeted the hair follicles compared to a drug solution. Enhanced hair follicles targeting was observed after the massage procedure, with 5 and 2-fold increases relative to NC and NC-CS, respectively. In conclusion, this work demonstrates dutasteride nanocapsules can target the follicular casts, and a simple physical stimulation can enhance 5-times the drug amount accumulated. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available