4.7 Article

Boosting Electrocatalytic N2 Reduction to NH3 over Two-Dimensional Gallium Selenide by Defect-Size Engineering

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 59, Issue 7, Pages 4858-4867

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00131

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21573002]
  2. Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar of Anhui Province [1908085J08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using density functional theory calculations, we propose that the exposed Ga atom in a two-dimensional defective gallium selenide monolayer (V-GaSe) can display a good dinitrogen fixation capacity and an excellent nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) performance. Our results show that N-2 can be captured by three sp a -hybridized Ga atoms due to the pulling effect. With the enlargement in vacancy size through applying tensile strain, the adsorption of N-2 is strengthened and the electrochemical NRR performance is enhanced. On 8% strained V-GaSe, the estimated onset potential is as low as 0.30 V. Inspired by the concept of defect-size-dependent NRR performance, we further design a Janus V-GaInSe2 structure in which the natural size of the cavity is enlarged and the electron density of the active Ga atoms is enriched. It is found that N-2 adsorption is demonstrably enhanced with respect to V-GaSe. On 4% strained V-GaInSe2, the onset potential is calculated to be 0.31 V, which is the same as the 8% strained V-GaSe. Moreover, the produced NH3 can be removed rapidly with a free-energy change of less than 0.52 eV, which is much lower than those of most reported catalysts with low overpotentials. Meanwhile, the side hydrogen evolution reaction is successively suppressed as the strain increases. Our work offers a feasible method that utilizes the size of a defect to tune the NRR performance, adding a new understanding of N-2 fixation and sustainable NH3 production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available