4.7 Article

Integrating reinforcement learning and skyline computing for adaptive service composition

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 519, Issue -, Pages 141-160

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.01.039

Keywords

Service composition; QoS; Reinforcement learning; Skyline computing; Adaptability

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFB1003800]
  2. NSFC [61672152, 61232007, 61532013]
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Novel Software Technology and Industrialization
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Wireless Communications Technology
  5. NSF IIS [IIS-1814450]
  6. ONR [N00014-18-1-2875]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In service computing, combining multiple services through service composition to address complex user requirements has become a popular research topic. QoS-aware service composition aims to find the optimal composition scheme with the QoS attributes that best match user requirements. However, certain QoS attributes may continuously change in a dynamic service environment, so service composition methods need to be adaptive. Furthermore, the large number of candidate services poses a key challenge for service composition, where existing service composition approaches based on reinforcement learning (RL) suffer from low efficiency. To deal with the problems above, in this paper, a new service composition approach is proposed which combines RL with skyline computing where the latter is used for reducing the search space and computational complexity. A WSCMDP model is proposed to solve the large-scale service composition within a dynamically changing environment. To verify the proposed method, a series of comparative experiments are conducted, and the experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness, scalability and adaptability of the proposed approach. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available