4.7 Article

Time course regulatory analysis based on paired expression and chromatin accessibility data

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 622-634

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.257063.119

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01HG010359, P50HG007735]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11871463, 61671444]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB13000000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A time course experiment is a widely used design in the study of cellular processes such as differentiation or response to stimuli. In this paper, we propose time course regulatory analysis (TimeReg) as a method for the analysis of gene regulatory networks based on paired gene expression and chromatin accessibility data from a time course. TimeReg can be used to prioritize regulatory elements, to extract core regulatory modules at each time point, to identify key regulators driving changes of the cellular state, and to causally connect the modules across different time points. We applied the method to analyze paired chromatin accessibility and gene expression data from a retinoic acid (RA)-induced mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) differentiation experiment. The analysis identified 57,048 novel regulatory elements regulating cerebellar development, synapse assembly, and hindbrain morphogenesis, which substantially extended our knowledge of cis-regulatory elements during differentiation. Using single-cell RNA-seq data, we showed that the core regulatory modules can reflect the properties of different subpopulations of cells. Finally, the driver regulators are shown to be important in clarifying the relations between modules across adjacent time points. As a second example, our method on Ascl1-induced direct reprogramming from fibroblast to neuron time course data identified Id1/2 as driver regulators of early stage of reprogramming.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available