4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Differences in soot produced from rapid pyrolysis of xylan, cellulose and lignin under pulverized-fuel conditions

Journal

FUEL
Volume 265, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116991

Keywords

Soot; Pyrolysis; Xylan; Cellulose; Lignin; Inorganic species

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Curtin University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the properties of size-segregated soot from rapid pyrolysis of three biomass model compounds (i.e., xylan, cellulose and lignin) in a drop-tube furnace under pulverized fuel conditions in argon at 1300 degrees C. Lignin (100.7 mg/g) yields much more soot than xylan and cellulose (7.0 and 11.6 mg/g, respectively) during pyrolysis. All soot samples have a unimodal size distribution but lignin soot has a considerably larger mode diameter (0.246 mu m) than soot from xylan and cellulose (0.043 and 0.077 mu m, respectively), attributing to enhanced agglomeration of soot formed from lignin pyrolysis. The fringe of soot from lignin pyrolysis is longer and straighter than that of xylan soot or cellulose soot. Additionally, soot from cellulose pyrolysis contains little inorganic species as cellulose contains little ash. However, for xylan and lignin that contain abundant inorganic species, considerable Na, K, Cl and S are present in the soot samples. Even though the yield of inorganic species in carbonaceous material with aerodynamic diameter <1 mu m (CM1) from xylan pyrolysis is lower than that from lignin pyrolysis, xylan soot has higher contents of inorganic species than lignin soot. The presence of Na and K in soot is attributed to the incorporation of these inorganic species in soot through organic bound and/or condensation. K is more likely to incorporate with soot than Na. More Na and K are incorporated with soot from xylan pyrolysis compared to those with soot from lignin pyrolysis. Non-mature soot contains higher contents of Na and K than mature soot does.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available