4.7 Article

Laminar Burning Velocities and Kinetic Modeling of a Renewable E-Fuel: Formic Acid and Its Mixtures with H2 and CO2

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 7564-7572

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00944

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. King Abdullah Univeristy of Science and Technology (KAUST)
  2. Saudi Aramco

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Formic acid is a promising fuel candidate that can be generated by reacting renewable hydrogen with carbon dioxide. However, the burning characteristics of formic acid/air mixtures have not been extensively studied. Furthermore, due to its low reactivity, the addition of hydrogen to formic acid/air mixtures may help with improving burning characteristics. This paper presents the first extensive study of formic acid/air premixed laminar burning velocities, as well as mixtures with hydrogen and carbon dioxide. Unstretched laminar burning velocities and Markstein lengths of formic acid in air for two different unburnt gas temperatures and equivalence ratios are presented. Measurements of formic acid mixed with various proportions of hydrogen and carbon dioxide in air are also studied as a potential renewable fuel for the future. Experimental results demonstrate the low burning velocities of formic acid and the ability to significantly enhance flame speeds by hydrogen addition. A modified detailed kinetic model for combustion of formic acid and its mixtures with hydrogen is proposed by merging well-validated literature models. The proposed model reproduces the experimental observations and provides the basis for understanding the combustion kinetics of formic acid laminar premixed flames, as well as mixtures with hydrogen. It is shown that the HOCO radical is the principal intermediate in formic acid combustion, and hydrogen addition accelerates the decomposition of HOCO radical thereby accelerating burning velocities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available