4.7 Article

High electricity generation and COD removal from cattle wastewater in microbial fuel cells with 3D air cathode employed non-precious Cu2O/reduced graphene oxide as cathode catalyst

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 196, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117123

Keywords

Cuprous oxide nanoparticles; Cattle wastewater; Microbial fuel cells; Oxygen reduction reaction; Reduce graphene oxide

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678323]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2017MEE026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we synthesized a non-precious Cu2O decorated reduced graphene oxide composite (Cu2O/rGO) by a facile and direct reduction strategy and evaluated the electricity generation and COD removal performance of MFCs with Cu2O/rGO as cathode catalyst in treating cattle wastewater. The Cu2O/rGO with the mass Cu(Ac)(2)/GO ratio of 450:50 exhibited the highest catalytic activity by cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiment. The large surface area (363.9 m(2) g(-1)) of Cu2O/rGO with numerous mesoporous exhibited higher exchange current density (12.38 mu A cm(-2)) and lower War-burg impedance (21.82 Omega) comparing with Pt/C (11.99 mu A cm(-2), 102.10 Omega), and contributed to 4-electron ORR. Notably, the maximum output voltage, power density and coulombic efficiency of MFC with 3D air cathode employed Cu2O/rGO catalyst reached 0.165 V, 1362 mW m(-2) and 54.9%, respectively, which were higher than those (0.152 V, 1166 mW m(-2) and 53.5%) with 3D air cathode employed Pt/C catalyst in treating cattle wastewater. Moreover, the average COD removal rate of MFC with Cu2O/rGO catalyst reached 71.5%, which were higher than those 69.8% with Pt/C catalyst. Generally, the MFC with 3D air cathode employed non-precious Cu(2)OrGO catalyst instead of Pt/C catalysts is a promising method for simultaneous electricity generation and cattle wastewater treatment. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available