4.8 Article

Loss of MeCP2 in cholinergic neurons causes part of RTT-like phenotypes via α7 receptor in hippocampus

Journal

CELL RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 728-742

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2016.48

Keywords

MeCP2; cholinergic system; Rett syndrome; RTT-like phenotypes

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China for Distinguished Young Scientists [81225007]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31430034, 91432306]
  3. Funds for Creative Research Groups of China [81221003]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  6. Zhejiang Province Program for Cultivation of High-level Health Talents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the X-linked MECP2 gene cause Rett syndrome (RTT), an autism spectrum disorder characterized by impaired social interactions, motor abnormalities, cognitive defects and a high risk of epilepsy. Here, we showed that conditional deletion of Mecp2 in cholinergic neurons caused part of RTT-like phenotypes, which could be rescued by re-expressing Mecp2 in the basal forebrain (BF) cholinergic neurons rather than in the caudate putamen of conditional knockout (Chat-Mecp2(-/y)) mice. We found that choline acetyltransferase expression was decreased in the BF and that alpha 7 nicotine acetylcholine receptor signaling was strongly impaired in the hippocampus of Chat-Mecp2(-/y) mice, which is sufficient to produce neuronal hyperexcitation and increase seizure susceptibility. Application of PNU282987 or nicotine in the hippocampus rescued these phenotypes in Chat-Mecp2(-/y) mice. Taken together, our findings suggest that MeCP2 is critical for normal function of cholinergic neurons and dysfunction of cholinergic neurons can contribute to numerous neuropsychiatric phenotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available