4.2 Review

Single-cell fate decisions of bipotential hematopoietic progenitors

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 232-240

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000592

Keywords

chromatin; fate commitment; fate probability; lineage bias; transcription factors

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [DK098449]
  2. CIHR [MOP89834, MOP343603]
  3. CEEHRC Initiative
  4. Canadian Cancer Research Society
  5. MRC Computational Biology Fellowship [MC_UU_12025]
  6. MRC Strategic Alliance Funding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review In hematopoiesis, rapid cell fate decisions are necessary for timely responses to environmental stimuli resulting in the production of diverse types of blood cells. Early studies have led to a hierarchical, tree-like view of hematopoiesis with hematopoietic stem cells residing at the apex and serially branching out to give rise to bipotential progenitors with increasingly restricted lineage potential. Recent single-cell studies have challenged some aspects of the classical model of hematopoiesis. Here, we review the latest articles on cell fate decision in hematopoietic progenitors, highlighting single-cell studies that have questioned previously established concepts and those that have reaffirmed them. Recent findings The hierarchical organization of hematopoiesis and the importance of transcription factors have been largely validated at the single-cell level. In contrast, single-cell studies have shown that lineage commitment is progressive rather than switch-like as originally proposed. Furthermore, the reconstruction of cell fate paths suggested the existence of a gradient of hematopoietic progenitors that are in a continuum of changing fate probabilities rather than in a static bipotential state, leading us to reconsider the notion of bipotential progenitors. Single-cell transcriptomic and proteomic studies have transformed our view of lineage commitment and offer a drastically different perspective on hematopoiesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available