4.7 Article

A comparative study for shear testing of thermoplastic-based composites and metal-composite hybrids

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105953

Keywords

Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Thermoplastic resin; Mechanical testing; Automated Fibre Placement (AFP)

Funding

  1. Commonwealth of Australia under the Australian Research Council [IC160100040]
  2. Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology
  3. Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy
  4. Austrian Government
  5. State Government of Styria
  6. State Government of Lower Austria
  7. State Government of Upper Austria
  8. Australian Research Council [IC160100040] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents the novel application of the compression shear test (CST) for characterising bonding strength of metal-composite hybrids made of steel and carbon fibre/polyamide 6 (CF/PA 6). An automated laser-assisted tape placement (ATP) process was used to lay-up the CF/PA 6 tapes on laser textured steel substrates. CST is of interest due to the ease of sample manufacturing as a relatively small test specimen is required. The results were compared with standardised single lap shear tests (ASTM D3165), which requires manufacturing of a double-notched test specimen. For benchmarking purposes, the compression shear test was also used to characterise the interlaminar shear strength of a plain CF/PA 6 composite. The results showed equivalent shear strength and similar failure modes for both tests of the metal-composite hybrid specimens. Grooved texturing of the steel substrate in the hybrid specimens promoted a mixed-mode (cohesive and adhesive) failure and a higher shear strength than for the composite-only specimens. Overall, the results showed that the compression shear test is a valid and efficient method to characterise the bonding strength of metal-composite hybrids and composites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available