4.5 Article

A study investigating the perfusion of colorectal anastomoses using fluorescence angiography: results of the FLAG randomized trial

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 1147-1153

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15037

Keywords

Anastomotic leaks; bowel perfusion; colorectal resection; colorectal anastomosis; fluorescence; indocyanine green

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography (FA) in reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) following colorectal anastomosis. Method A single-centre randomized trial was undertaken between 2018 and 2019. Those patients who underwent a stapled colorectal anastomosis were randomized 1:1 for ICG FA versus visual clinical assessment of blood perfusion of the anastomosed colon and rectal stump (non-ICG FA group). The primary end-point was to assess whether ICG FA was associated with a reduction in the incidence of AL. Secondary outcomes were the rate of postoperative complications and change in the level of bowel resection. Results A total of 380 patients undergoing sigmoid and rectal resection were enrolled. After randomization, three patients were excluded. The results of 377 cases were available for analysis; 187 had ICG FA and 190 were in the non-ICG FA group. ICG FA identified impaired blood perfusion of the colon in 36 (19%) cases. An AL (grade A, B or C) developed in 48 patients: 17 (9.1%) in the ICG FA group and 31 (16.3%) in the non-ICG FA group (P = 0.04). ICG FA did not decrease the rate of AL of high anastomoses (9-15 cm from the anal verge), at 1.3%vs4.6% in the non-ICG FA group (P = 0.37). In contrast, a decrease in AL rate was found for low (4-8 cm) colorectal anastomoses (14.4% in ICG FAvs25.7% in the non-ICG FA group;P = 0.04). Conclusion ICG FA is associated with a reduction in AL following low anterior resection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available