4.6 Article

Cellular microenvironment controls the nuclear architecture of breast epithelia through β1-integrin

Journal

CELL CYCLE
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 345-356

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1121354

Keywords

extracellular matrix; breast mammary gland; cell cycle; breast cancer; cell senescence; integrin; nuclear structure

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [080172/Z/06/Z]
  2. Lundbeck Foundation [R93-2011-8990] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF15OC0016584, NNF12OC0002290] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. The Danish Cancer Society [R124-A7785] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Wellcome Trust [080172/Z/06/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Defects in nuclear architecture occur in a variety of diseases, however the fundamental mechanisms that control the internal structure of nuclei are poorly defined. Here we reveal that the cellular microenvironment has a profound influence on the global internal organization of nuclei in breast epithelia. A 3D microenvironment induces a prolonged but reversible form of cell cycle arrest that features many of the classical markers of cell senescence. This unique form of arrest is dependent on signaling from the external microenvironment through beta 1-integrins. It is concomitant with alterations in nuclear architecture that characterize the withdrawal from cell proliferation. Unexpectedly, following prolonged cell cycle arrest in 3D, the senescence-like state and associated reprogramming of nuclear architecture are freely reversible on altering the dimensionality of the cellular microenvironment. Breast epithelia can therefore maintain a proliferative plasticity that correlates with nuclear remodelling. However, the changes in nuclear architecture are cell lineage-specific and do not occur in fibroblasts, and moreover they are overcome in breast cancer cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available