4.6 Article

An experimental method for squealer tip flow field considering relative casing motion

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS
Volume 33, Issue 7, Pages 1942-1952

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.03.002

Keywords

Blade tip/casing gap measurement; Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV); Relative casing motion; Similarity transformation; Turbine; Wide range of variable incidence angles

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Squealer tip is widely used in turbines to reduce tip leakage loss. In typical turbine environment, the squealer tip leakage flow is affected by multiple factors such as the relative casing motion and the wide range of variable incidence angles. The development of experimental methods which can accurately model the real turbine environment and influencing factors is of great significance to study the squealer tip leakage flow mechanism. In the present paper, a low-speed turbine cascade test facility which can model the relative casing motion and wide range of variable incidence angles (-25 degrees to 55 degrees) is built. Based on the similarity criteria, a high-low speed similarity transformation method of the turbine cascade is established by considering the thickness of the turbine blade. A combined testing method of Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and local pressure measurement is proposed to obtain the complex flow structures within the tip cavity. The results show that the experimental method can successfully model the relative casing motion and the wide range of variable incidence angles. The low-speed cascade obtained by the similarity transformation can model the high-speed flow accurately. The measurement technique developed can obtain the complex flow field and successfully capture the scraping vortex within the squealer tip. (C) 2020 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astrona Lilies. Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available