4.6 Review

Nanostructures for Electrocatalytic CO2Reduction

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 26, Issue 62, Pages 14024-14035

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202000692

Keywords

activity; electrocatalysis; electrochemical CO(2)reduction; nanostructured catalysts; selectivity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875048, 21905063]
  2. Outstanding Youth Project of Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2020B151502071]
  3. Key Project of Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2017A030311016]
  4. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2018A030310339]
  5. Major Scientific Project of Guangdong University [2017KZDXM059]
  6. Yangcheng Scholars Research Project of Guangzhou [201831820]
  7. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan [805147327054]
  8. Guangzhou University's 2017 Training Program for Young Top-Notch Personnel [BJ201704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the most effective ways to cope with the problems of global warming and the energy shortage crisis is to develop renewable and clean energy sources. To achieve a carbon-neutral energy cycle, advanced carbon sequestration technologies are urgently needed, but because CO(2)is a thermodynamically stable molecule with the highest carbon valence state of +4, this process faces many challenges. In recent years, electrochemical CO(2)reduction has become a promising approach to fix and convert CO(2)into high-value-added fuels and chemical feedstock. However, the large-scale commercial use of electrochemical CO(2)reduction systems is hindered by poor electrocatalyst activity, large overpotential, low energy conversion efficiency, and product selectivity in reducing CO2. Therefore, there is an urgent need to rationally design highly efficient, stable, and scalable electrocatalysts to alleviate these problems. This minireview also aims to classify heterogeneous nanostructured electrocatalysts for the CO(2)reduction reaction (CDRR).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available