4.8 Article

RUNX1 Is a Driver of Renal Cell Carcinoma Correlating with Clinical Outcome

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 80, Issue 11, Pages 2325-2339

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-3870

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Core Services and Advanced Technologies at the Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute [C596/A17196]
  2. CRUK [C596/A17196]
  3. Renal Cancer Research Fund Scotland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recurring association of specific genetic lesions with particular types of cancer is a fascinating and largely unexplained area of cancer biology. This is particularly true of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) where, although key mutations such as loss of VHL is an almost ubiquitous finding, there remains a conspicuous lack of targetable genetic drivers. In this study, we have identified a previously unknown protumorigenic role for the RUNX genes in this disease setting. Analysis of patient tumor biopsies together with loss-of-function studies in preclinical models established the importance of RUNX1 and RUNX2 in ccRCC. Patients with high RUNX1 (and RUNX2) expression exhibited significantly poorer clinical survival compared with patients with low expression. This was functionally relevant, as deletion of RUNX1 in ccRCC cell lines reduced tumor cell growth and viability in vitro and in vivo. Transcriptional profiling of RUNX1-CRISPR-deleted cells revealed a gene signature dominated by extracellular matrix remodeling, notably affecting STMN3, SERPINH1, and EPHRIN signaling. Finally, RUNX1 deletion in a genetic mouse model of kidney cancer improved overall survival and reduced tumor cell proliferation. In summary, these data attest to the validity of targeting a RUNX1-transcriptional program in ccRCC. Significance: These data reveal a novel unexplored oncogenic role for RUNX genes in kidney cancer and indicate that targeting the effects of RUNX transcriptional activity could be relevant for clinical intervention in ccRCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available